
Caption: Just last month, the U.S. Department of Justice announced the results of its 2025 National Health Care Fraud takedown, resulting in criminal charges against over 300 defendants and implicating dozens of providers in telemedicine-related fraud schemes. Learn more about what this takedown means for the future of telehealth fraud enforcement.
On June 30, 2025, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced the results of its 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown. With over $14 billion in intended loss to federal health care programs and criminal charges brought against a whopping 324 defendants, the takedown marks what the DOJ calls an unprecedented effort to combat health care fraud across the country.
The takedown announcement highlighted a variety of fraud schemes that will unfold across the country over the coming months. 29 defendants were charged for their roles as participants in multinational criminal organizations to defraud American health care programs by submitting fraudulent claims using stolen Medicare beneficiary information, identified in part thanks to the nationwide investigation known as Operation Gold Rush. Hundreds more were implicated in fraud schemes involving false claims for amniotic wound allografts, prescription opioid trafficking, and receiving billions from various false claims and kickback schemes.
Unsurprisingly, the takedown also featured charges against 49 defendants in connection with telemedicine and genetic testing fraud schemes, involving a combined $1.17 billion in fraudulent claims to Medicare. While many of the defendants were charged for their roles as owners in telemedicine or durable medical equipment companies, several defendants were providers who participated in arrangements in exchange for kickbacks for prescriptions or other services that were not provided or medically necessary. The DOJ emphasized in its notice that it “continues to focus on eliminating health care fraud schemes that depend on telemedicine,” another sign that telehealth will remain a key focus of the federal government’s continued and coordinated effort to pursue robust enforcement of health care fraud and abuse laws.
A New Era of Regulatory Oversight: What the Takedown Means for Telehealth Providers
This year’s takedown involved criminal fraud charges brought against multiple providers for their involvement in fraudulent telemedicine and genetic testing schemes, involving more than $1.17 billion in false claims submitted to Medicare. While last year’s takedown featured similar schemes as those noted in 2025’s takedown, the notable increase in the number of providers charged with fraud offenses underscores the need for telehealth providers to exercise renewed vigilance in assessing their practices for compliance with federal fraud and abuse laws. With the recent formation of the DOJ-HHS False Claims Act Working Group, it’s clear that healthcare fraud is a key priority for the present administration - and the stakes for providers have never been higher.
While the consequences of criminal charges are significant, the takedown is also a stark reminder that federal regulators have not taken their feet off the gas when it comes to imposing civil penalties. As part of the takedown, CMS announced that it had suspended billing privileges for 205 providers in the months leading up to last month’s announcement. Further, nearly two dozen providers are now facing civil charges in connection with the takedown, with over 100 agreeing to civil settlements totaling more than $34 million. But these settlements are far from the only penalties are likely to face - many are likely to face disciplinary actions in their state of practices, and could be excluded from participation in federal health care programs altogether depending on the severity of the fraud perpetrated.
While telemedicine has been a key focus for federal regulators following the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine fraud schemes continue to rapidly evolve, particularly with the rise of AI. For providers wanting to protect their reputation, it’s never been more important to closely review arrangements with telemedicine companies for potential fraud risks. Companies that allow for little to no contact between providers and patients, only furnish a limited set of products, and provide a volume-based compensation structure, are key red flags that could expose you to serious criminal penalties and serious reputational harm.
Your Trusted Partners in Fighting Health Care Fraud Allegations
Health Law Alliance specializes in helping providers navigate health care fraud audits, investigations, and probes before they threaten your practice - and your professional reputation. Spearheaded by former federal and state prosecutors with decades of experience, our team has the insider expertise you need on your side.
MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Telehealth Audit Season: OIG Found 7 Percent Error Rate in Pandemic-Era E/M Billing
A 2024 OIG study found that 7% of E/M services billed during the pandemic were noncompliant with Medicare billing requirements. We break down OIG’s findings and explain what they mean in an era where RPM audits are on the rise.
Read More >>Health Law Alliance Earns Reinstatement for DME Supplier Whose Medicare Billing Privileges Were Unjustly Revoked
Due to Health Law Alliance’s advocacy, a prominent DME vendor in Texas had their billing privileges reinstated this week, without having to jump through the arduous, costly hoops of a fair hearing in front of an Administrative Law Judge or a Departmental Appeals Board review.
Read More >>Balancing Patient Access and Privacy in Audio-Only Telehealth
Address the specific compliance and privacy challenges associated with audio-only telehealth services. This article will provide telehealth providers with actionable strategies to ensure compliance with privacy regulations, such as HIPAA, while effectively using audio-only visits to increase access to care.
Read More >>10 Telehealth Fraud Red Flags (and How to Avoid Them)
Provide telehealth providers with a concise guide to recognizing and mitigating potential fraud risks. Each “red flag” will highlight a common scenario that could indicate fraud vulnerability, followed by practical steps to address it. With clear, actionable insights, the article will be an essential resource for telehealth providers aiming to safeguard their practice.
Read More >>