Federal prosecutors have charged numerous New York pharmacy owners and employees with criminal violations relating to OTC card exchanges and nominal benefits. Because these practices are widespread, providers should act immediately to limit their exposure as the crackdown expands.
Government’s Healthcare Fraud Investigation
At the time of this update, the federal government has filed criminal charges against numerous pharmacy owners and employees for violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute and Healthcare Fraud relating to OTC card exchanges and nominal benefits, including $3 supermarket coupons, $2 in-store credits, and waivers of $3 copayments.
The government alleges in these cases that patients, pharmacies, and physicians all participated in a loop of bribery, referrals and billing fraud. These charges are severe and carry prison terms of up to 10 years’ incarceration.
Healthcare Fraud Based on OTC Benefits
Specifically, the government alleges that patients were paid kickbacks by pharmacies in the form of OTC and other common benefits, such as co-pay waivers.
The pharmacies then allegedly referred their patients to physicians, who wrote medically unnecessary prescriptions for high-reimbursing drugs and DME. The patients, in turn, returned to the referring pharmacies, where the prescriptions were filled to the tune of tens of millions of dollars in federal reimbursement.
Although the government has yet to unveil charges against physicians who participated in the scheme, those charges have either been filed under seal and the physicians are cooperating, or they will be filed publicly soon.
Healthcare Fraud Theory of Prosecution
Notably, the theory of prosecution in these cases is incredibly broad. For example, the government alleges that “a common means of providing kickbacks and bribes to Medicare beneficiaries and Medicaid recipients and facilitating fraud schemes for medically unnecessary medications is to fail to charge such individuals the copayments due for their prescriptions.”
On the other hand, the OIG has recognized that copay waivers may be appropriate based on individualized assessments of financial need, and has never charged a patient with receiving a so-called bribe in the form of a co-pay waiver.
Accordingly, the sweeping charging theory in these cases means that a pharmacist may be criminally charged if he or she has waived copays or offered other nominal benefits to customers, such as accepting OTC cards for non-eligible items, who then filled medically unnecessary prescriptions, irrespective of whether the pharmacist knew the order lacked medical necessity.
This exposure is troubling for a number of reasons. First, pharmacists typically have no insight whatsoever into whether a prescribed drug is medically necessary to treat a patient’s condition. Second, the circumstances in which a pharmacist can legally refuse to fill a prescription vary, and may depend on state law. Third, despite the prevalence of co-pay waivers and OTC violations throughout the industry, federal prosecutors are using data to target “outlier” pharmacies without regard to customer base or underlying patient conditions.
HLA Specializes in Healthcare Fraud Defense
In short, if your pharmacy has offered nominal benefits involving OTC cards and co-pay waivers to customers, you may have criminal exposure. There are a number of immediate steps that clients can take to better understand and limit that risk. At Health Law Alliance, our experienced healthcare defense attorneys have represented numerous clients under federal investigation for the practices described in this article. Our firm’s mission is simple: use unmatched experience and insight to defend our clients against insurance conglomerates, the federal government, and state agencies. We used to work for them. Now let us fight for you. Contact us today for a COMPLIMENTARY consultation. We can help.
Express Scripts FWA Investigative Alert: Crackdown on CoverMyMeds Provider Accounts
Express Scripts is targeting prior authorization Fraud, Waste & Abuse involving the use of CoverMyMeds provider accounts by pharmacies. Pharmacies and physicians beware.
Read More >>Corporate Advice: Asset Deals – Advantages & Disadvantages
In the final Part Three of a three-part series on corporate transactions, we describe important considerations around structuring the sale of a business as an "asset" sale.
Read More >>Increased Scrutiny for DEA Registration Applications
DEA registration applications are receiving increased scrutiny as DEA turns its sights on providers and pharmacies to curtail controlled substance misuse and abuse. Applicants can and should take steps to ensure the registration process moves as quickly and smoothly as possible.
Read More >>Corporate Advice: Stock Deals – Advantages & Disadvantages
In Part Two of a three-part series on corporate transactions, we describe important considerations around structuring the sale of a business as a "stock" sale, including advantages and disadvantages compared to an "asset" sale.
Read More >>