Frequently Asked Questions

Given the highly regulated healthcare industry, pharmacies often find themselves navigating complex legal terrain, especially when faced with the daunting prospect of network termination. HLA specializes in providing robust legal support to pharmacies, ensuring their rights are protected and their voices heard.

PBM Terminations are Often Pretextual

PBMs monitor prescription mix and reimbursements, often focusing on those pharmacies that dispense high-cost or high-margin drugs. If a PBM determines that a pharmacy is dispensing a disproportionate amount of such products, that pharmacy often will be targeted for a PBM audit.

There are many legitimate explanations for atypical dispensing patterns, none of which involve a violation of the provider manual or network enrollment forms. Nonetheless, PBMs will often terminate pharmacies in these scenarios based on failure to collect co-pays, aberrant products, or other pretextual reasons.

HLA's Strategic Approach on Appeal

An independent pharmacy based in Texas retained us after receiving a termination notice from a major PBM. The termination letter asserted that the pharmacy had violated various provisions of the PBM provider manual, including the dispensing of aberrant products.

Our approach to win on appeal was strategic and multifaceted. We began by meticulously dissecting the grounds for termination and identifying any legal vulnerabilities. Through extensive research and analysis, we crafted a compelling argument to challenge the PBM's decision, highlighting why termination was unjustified and disproportionate to the alleged conduct.

Fierce Legal Argument is Critical to Success

We engaged in extensive discussions with the PBM's attorney, presenting our case persuasively and advocating fiercely on behalf of our pharmacy client. Our audit defense team leveraged our attorneys’ deep understanding of healthcare law and industry dynamics to negotiate effectively and navigate the intricacies of PBM contracts and provider manuals.

Ultimately, the PBM was forced to accept the merits of our arguments and rescind the termination notice. This pivotal moment marked a significant victory for our client and serves as a testament to the power of skilled legal representation.

Remedial Action Helps Prevent Future Targeting

In many cases, effective remedial action helps to address the PBM's concerns and avoid additional PBM audits. Here, unfortunately, the pharmacy had not complied with the corrective action plan (CAP) we had implemented, which made our appeal all the more difficult.

Nonetheless, remedial action is often imperfect, especially when manual processes are involved. Accordingly, we collaborated with our client to develop a more robust and improved CAP to address the PBM's concerns. Such comprehensive compliance measures are often necessary to protect pharmacies from future PBM scrutiny.

HLA is Available to Help

Here at HLA, we take pride in our ability to deliver tangible results for clients. Our successful reversal of PBM termination is just one example of our unwavering commitment to protecting the interests of independent pharmacies nationwide. Whether it is navigating PBM audit disputes, regulatory compliance, board matters, or government investigations, we stand ready to advocate fiercely on behalf of our pharmacy clients and secure favorable outcomes.

If your pharmacy is facing challenges within the complex landscape of healthcare, do not navigate them alone. Contact us today to learn more about how we can support your legal needs and safeguard your pharmacy business.

MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY

Get a Free Case REVIEW

100% Confidential & Secure. Your details are safe with us.

We'll speak soon!

In the meantime, why not find out more about us or visit our blog.

Alternatively, give us a call at (800) 345 - 4125

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Resolving Prescription “Red Flags” Is No Longer Optional: Federal Scrutiny Tightens on Controlled-Substance Dispensing

Pharmacists must resolve “red flags” under the Controlled Substances Act’s corresponding-responsibility requirements before dispensing controlled substances. Overlooking warning signs, such as cash-paid, high-dose opioid prescriptions—can now trigger False Claims Act liability and massive penalties, as demonstrated by Walgreens’ $350 million settlement in April 2025.

Read More >>

9th Circuit’s Landmark EKRA Ruling—What Providers Should Know

On July 11, 2025, the 9th Circuit upheld a laboratory operator’s convictions for violating EKRA by paying marketing agents to mislead providers into providing patient referrals for medically unnecessary blood tests. In this article, we analyze the 9th Circuit’s ruling and what it means for the future of EKRA enforcement.

Read More >>

Collateral Consequences Mount Quickly After Adverse DEA Inspection

Adverse findings during a DEA inspection can trigger a chain reaction of serious consequences for pharmacies, including increasing fines, suspension or revocation of DEA registrations and pharmacy licenses, costly False Claims Act (FCA) lawsuits, and potential criminal liability.

Read More >>

Heath Law Alliance Secures Reversal of a Medicaid Payment Suspension

Health Law Alliance successfully secured a full reversal of a Medi-Cal payment suspension for a California pharmacy, overturning speculative allegations made by the Department of Health Care Services. This case highlights the firm’s ability to protect healthcare providers against unjust enforcement actions and the critical value of experienced legal counsel in Medicaid and insurance disputes.

Read More >>