Defense for DME suppliers facing DME MAC, ZPIC, UPIC, and RAC audits.
Request a Free Case ReviewDurable medical equipment (DME) suppliers face concentrated audit risk across DME MAC contractors, ZPIC/UPIC integrity investigators, RAC contractors on the postpayment overpayment side, and DOJ Civil Division on the False Claims Act side.
The substantive defense framework comes back to a small number of recurring categories: signature documentation, proof of delivery, HCPCS code accuracy, medical necessity documentation, and the underlying physician orders. Health Law Alliance defends DME suppliers across all four contractor types and the parallel FCA track. Defense framework starts at the AOB and POD record.
.png)
Anthony's background as a former federal prosecutor and executive for major healthcare companies provided a level of expertise and insight that made all the difference. His deep understanding of healthcare law, particularly in litigation and compliance matters, helped navigate complex legal issues with ease.
With upmost professional respect, I will be forever grateful to have such caring individuals as Attorney Anthony Mahajan and Attorney Diana Yastrovskaya who come into my life, even though I am a business owner but I always felt I was treated as a friend and was made reaching out to them with ease.
I had a great experience working with Health Law Alliance. From the very beginning, their team was incredibly helpful, responsive, and professional. They answered all of my questions quickly and kept me informed throughout the entire process.
Anthony and his staff have gone above and beyond. His proactive communication and ability to handle complex legal scenarios effectively have been a significant asset. Highly recommended attorney.
Top-notch attorneys with an unparalleled scope of experience and breadth of knowledge. You will want them in your corner.
Had nothing but great experience from them. Knowledgeable and professional in all aspects. They have a vast knowledge in health care cases, great to be on your side against insurances.
Trustworthy and experienced.
The first response is not a routine administrative task. It establishes the documents, timing, and record the contractor can later use in its findings and on appeal.
Our bench includes a former federal prosecutor who served as Chief Compliance Officer of UnitedHealth Group, OptumRx’s parent company. We know the audit workflow because we wrote it. This is how we dismantle it.
Within 24 hours: parse every deadline in the audit notice, place a litigation hold on the claims at issue, and preserve adjudication logs before the PBM rotates them out.
Claim-by-claim reconstruction: prescriber PA rationale, plan criteria at time of fill, BMI/A1C/comorbidity support, step-therapy chain, and compounding regulatory posture. Every flagged script gets its own defense memo.
We draft and file the written appeal, quantify the PBM's extrapolation errors, and negotiate directly with the auditor and network relations - using relationships and playbooks from our time inside the PBM.
If the PBM refuses a reasonable resolution, we file in federal court and pair the suit with regulatory defense at DEA, FDA, and the state board - so a PBM dispute does not escalate into a license action.
Health Law Alliance handles the response and any parallel appeal, licensing matter or referral as one coordinated matter, so the strategy does not change hands as the matter moves between forums.
The bench includes a former Assistant U.S. Attorney nominated for the DOJ Director's Award, senior healthcare-company counsel, and attorney-providers with experience across healthcare audits and investigations.
Agency and company marks identify former professional experience of individual HLA team members. They do not imply affiliation, endorsement, or a client relationship.
Before you write a single page of your written response, have a privileged conversation with attorneys who have overseen 2,000+ audits - from both sides of the table. Free, confidential, no retainer.