A payment suspension stops the money before anything is decided, and the route out of it is not the ordinary appeal process.
Request a Free Case ReviewUnder 42 C.F.R. § 405.371, CMS may suspend Medicare payments in whole or in part where there is a credible allegation of fraud. The suspension can be imposed without prior notice, and the money stops while the underlying investigation continues.
The critical point is procedural: a payment suspension is not an initial determination, so it does not enter the ordinary five-level Medicare appeals process. The mechanism is a rebuttal statement, and the period for filing it is measured in days, not months. Treating a suspension like an appealable denial is the most common and most costly mistake.
.png)
Anthony's background as a former federal prosecutor and executive for major healthcare companies provided a level of expertise and insight that made all the difference. His deep understanding of healthcare law, particularly in litigation and compliance matters, helped navigate complex legal issues with ease.
With upmost professional respect, I will be forever grateful to have such caring individuals as Attorney Anthony Mahajan and Attorney Diana Yastrovskaya who come into my life, even though I am a business owner but I always felt I was treated as a friend and was made reaching out to them with ease.
I had a great experience working with Health Law Alliance. From the very beginning, their team was incredibly helpful, responsive, and professional. They answered all of my questions quickly and kept me informed throughout the entire process.
Anthony and his staff have gone above and beyond. His proactive communication and ability to handle complex legal scenarios effectively have been a significant asset. Highly recommended attorney.
Top-notch attorneys with an unparalleled scope of experience and breadth of knowledge. You will want them in your corner.
Had nothing but great experience from them. Knowledgeable and professional in all aspects. They have a vast knowledge in health care cases, great to be on your side against insurances.
Trustworthy and experienced.
Suspension is an interim measure, not a finding of liability, but the cash flow effect is immediate and total for providers whose revenue is predominantly Medicare. The suspension runs for an initial period of 180 days and can be extended, which means a provider can be without Medicare revenue for a year or more while an investigation it cannot see proceeds. The rebuttal is the only early opportunity to change that.
Suspension withholds payment on claims that have been submitted and on those still to come. Services already delivered go unpaid. For providers where Medicare is the majority of revenue, the operational question becomes payroll within weeks, not the merits of the allegation.
The suspension is not an initial determination, so the redetermination and reconsideration ladder does not apply to it. A rebuttal statement is submitted to the contractor and considered by CMS. It is a short, evidence-led document, and it is usually the only chance to affect the suspension before the investigation concludes.
A credible allegation of fraud generally means a program integrity contractor, and often HHS-OIG or DOJ, is already involved. The suspension is frequently the first visible sign of an investigation that has been running for some time, and the response has to be written with that audience in mind.
Four features separate a payment suspension from an ordinary overpayment dispute.
The first response is not a routine administrative task. It establishes the documents, timing, and record the contractor can later use in its findings and on appeal.
Four stages, with the decisive work in the first fortnight.
We establish exactly what has been suspended, on what claims, from what date, and when notice was given, because the rebuttal period runs from that. In parallel we confirm whether a Medicaid suspension has been or is about to be imposed on the same facts.
The notice is usually thin. We reconstruct the likely basis from billing data, recent audit history, records requests, and any contractor contact, so the rebuttal answers the real allegation rather than a guess at it.
The rebuttal is short and it is read by people who see many of them. Claim-level documentation, corrected data where there is a genuine error, and completed remediation carry the weight. Assertions of good character do not.
Where OIG or DOJ involvement is likely, the rebuttal is written so it does not create problems in that forum. At the same time we work the practical position: what may still be billed, what may be appealed separately, and where good cause arguments exist on the Medicaid side.
Health Law Alliance handles the response and any parallel appeal, licensing matter or referral as one coordinated matter, so the strategy does not change hands as the matter moves between forums.
The bench includes a former Assistant U.S. Attorney nominated for the DOJ Director's Award, senior healthcare-company counsel, and attorney-providers with experience across healthcare audits and investigations.
Agency and company marks identify former professional experience of individual HLA team members. They do not imply affiliation, endorsement, or a client relationship.
Seven questions that come up on almost every first call. The answers below are general; specific situations require privileged consultation.
Send us the suspension notice and the recent remittance advices. We will tell you what the likely allegation is, what the rebuttal should contain, and whether a Medicaid suspension is coming on the same facts. Free, confidential, no retainer.