As you probably realized long ago, one of the most effective ways in which to increase margin is through the scale provided by multiple locations. In this introductory article, we describe preliminary considerations around deal structure.
Introduction
When selling a small business, the buyer and seller generally have two options. One, the buyer can buy all of the shares of the operating company being sold from its current owner(s).
Or two, the buyer can buy all of the assets of the operating company from the operating company itself. There are advantages and disadvantages to each of these alternatives. Some of them benefit the buyer and some of them benefit the seller.
Asset Sales vs. Stock Sales
The differences between a stock deal and an asset deal can be very substantial. These differences include the amount of work that must be done by the company’s managers and employees after the deal closes, the potential for unexpected liabilities, tax implications, and other business and legal considerations.
For example, asset deals often have some very substantial benefits for the buyer relating to taxes, corporate formalities, and potential unknown liabilities. They provide the buyer and seller with a lot of flexibility. However, the business interruption that can take place in an asset deal can be prohibitive. Asset deals may require informing and/or renegotiating contracts with employees, customers and suppliers.
Also, the tax issues are particularly important to consider. For example, while an asset deal may be beneficial to the buyer for certain income tax considerations, it may be problematic for other income tax issues. And other tax issues need to be considered as well, such as sales and transfer taxes.
Sometimes one type of deal would benefit the buyer while the other type of deal would benefit the seller. And, unfortunately, often buyers and sellers don’t think about many of these issues until well into the negotiation process.
Understanding the differences between these two types of deals is important and should be thoroughly considered to determine the benefits and drawbacks of both alternatives. It is often a good idea to seek the advice of competent legal counsel early in the negotiation process to determine which type of deal structure would benefit you the most.
Conclusion
HLA routinely handles corporate transactions for healthcare acquisitions and mergers. If you are thinking about purchasing or selling a business and want to learn more, please don't hesitate to contact us with any questions.
MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Why Even Minor Documentation Errors Can Be Costly for Pharmacies Facing a PBM Audit
PBMs are using rigid documentation standards to recoup payments and pressure pharmacies. Minor clerical errors can now threaten reimbursement and network participation.
Read More >>The Hidden PBM Threat Putting Pharmacies at Risk: Affiliation-Based Network Terminations
PBMs are quietly expanding their power, terminating pharmacies based on affiliation rather than wrongdoing and putting entire businesses at risk overnight.
Read More >>Health Law Alliance Successfully Defends a New York Pharmacy in an Optum Audit
Facing an Optum PBM audit that threatened network participation, a New York pharmacy turned to Health Law Alliance for strategic legal guidance, resulting in a successful audit resolution and uninterrupted network status.
Read More >>The Performant Audit Playbook: How to Protect Your Practice from New York’s New Medicaid RAC
For years, New York healthcare providers have navigated the complex oversight of the Office of the Medicaid Inspector General (OMIG), primarily through its Medicaid Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) vendors. In April 2025 the landscape shifted as the state engaged Performant Healthcare Solutions (“Performant”) as its exclusive Medicaid Recovery Audit Contractor (“RAC”).
Read More >>