Martha M. Rumore, PharmD, JD, MS, LLM, FAPhA is Of Counsel at Health Law Alliance and a registered U.S. Patent Attorney

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is an Ozempic compliance program necessary?

Healthcare is a highly regulated industry, and an effective compliance program helps to reduce the risk of regulatory noncompliance.

What are the elements of an Ozempic compliance program?

Compliance programs typically include seven elements, including written policies and procedures; employee training and education; monitoring; and remedial action.

Who is responsible for administering an Ozempic compliance program?

Depending on the size of the business, compliance oversight may be performed by a designed Chief Compliance Officer, Compliance Committee, or Board of Directors. In smaller businesses, a Compliance Manager or Business Lead may perform the function.

In September 2025, the Food and Drug Administration issued over 50 Warning Letters to companies for marketing compounded GLP’s as ‘generic versions’ or that make comparative claims to FDA-approved versions. This has long been the focus of Cease & Desist letters from the brand manufacturers to 503A compounders. FDA also issued a series of letters regarding mostly peptides being sold as ‘research use only’ (RUO) where the advertising indicated the product was intended for human use. The Warning Letters targeted mostly semaglutide, tirzepatide and retatrutide as well as other peptides such as BPC-157 and selective androgen receptor or anabolic steroids (SARMS) such as trendione. Retatrutide cannot be compounded at all because it is an investigational drug. Other Warning Letters pertained to insanitary conditions for 503A compounders. FDA inspects 503A compounders pursuant to its insanitary guidance standards rather than USP and compounders need to be fluent in the requirements of that Guidance.

In September 2025, the Food and Drug Administration issued over 50 Warning Letters to companies for marketing compounded GLP’s as ‘generic versions’ or that make comparative claims to FDA-approved versions.

Warning Letters issued to 503B Outsourcing Facilities were for cGMP violations, failure to submit Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) reports to FDA (which 503B facilities are required to report), compounding unapproved drug products. Some 503B Warning letters involved mislabeling where the compounded product did not bear the label ‘this is a compounded drug’ or ‘this is a repackaged drug.’ Others pertained to inadequate Policies & Procedures (P&P) for the Quality Control units.

Also in September 2025, FDA established a ‘Green List Import Alert’ (66-80) to help stop GLP-1 API’s that have potential quality concerns from entering the U.S. supply chain. Concurrently, FDA has increased unannounced inspections of foreign API manufacturers and is also stepping up Remote Inspections via FDA form 4003.

FDA has increased unannounced inspections of foreign API manufacturers and is also stepping up Remote Inspections via FDA form 4003.

Whether you are a 503A pharmacy compounder or a 503B Outsourcing Facility you should have your labeling, Website and Social Media advertising, P&P and compounded products reviewed for compliance with current FDA Guidance. If you are facing either an FDA or Board of Pharmacy inspection or just need to get up to speed on the latest compounding requirements, contact us today.

MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY

Get a Free Consultation

100% Confidential & Secure. Your details are safe with us.

We'll speak soon!

In the meantime, why not find out more about us or visit our blog.

Alternatively, give us a call at (800) 345 - 4125

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

OMIG Audit Defense New York: What the 2026 Work Plan Means for Providers

Every year, the New York Office of the Medicaid Inspector General (OMIG) releases its Work Plan outlining enforcement priorities. The 2026 plan sends a clear signal that Medicaid providers in New York are entering a far more aggressive enforcement environment.

Read More >>

PBM Member Denial Audit Findings: A Growing Threat to Pharmacies

Pharmacies undergoing a Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) audit are typically prepared to address inventory discrepancies and documentation issues. What many are not prepared for, however, is the increasing use of PBM member denial findings, allegations that a patient claims they did not receive and/or did not authorize the dispensing of a medication for which a claim was submitted.

Read More >>

From Minor PBM Audit Finding to Major Liability: How Small Issues Trigger Big Consequences

Pharmacies often approach a PBM audit with the understanding that small discrepancies and modest recoupments are simply part of doing business. In today’s enforcement landscape, that assumption is no longer safe.

Read More >>

HLA’s Latest PBM Win Highlights the Dangers of Inventory Discrepancies

Inventory discrepancies are one of the first things PBMs look for during an audit. Even minor clerical errors like entering the incorrect NDC or failing to return a medication to stock can snowball, creating major financial risks that could place your pharmacy in jeopardy.

Read More >>