An Ohio provider that receives an audit notice or a Surveillance and Utilization Review (SURS) letter from the Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) is entering a process with defined deadlines and real financial exposure. ODM's program integrity function reviews paid claims for compliance with Ohio Revised Code Chapter 5164 and Ohio Administrative Code Chapter 5160-1, and a finding of overpayment can trigger recoupment, interest, and in some cases a referral for further investigation. Missing a reconsideration deadline, or responding to a document request without counsel, can convert a correctable billing dispute into a final agency order. Providers who understand the audit sequence, and who act quickly at each stage, keep more control over the outcome.

How Ohio Medicaid Audits Begin

ODM's Surveillance and Utilization Review Section conducts most provider audits, a postpayment examination of paid claims performed to determine program compliance, verify the validity of payments, and identify inappropriate payments under Ohio Administrative Code Chapter 5160-1. ODM is authorized to use statistical sampling and extrapolation, projecting the error rate found in a sample of claims across a much larger universe of paid claims, which is why a review of a small claim sample can generate a large overpayment demand. Providers who bill through Ohio's Medicaid managed care plans face a related but separate audit track initiated by the plan itself, discussed in Medicaid Managed Care Plan Audits: When the MCO Comes Calling.

The Reconsideration Process

Before an audit finding becomes final, Ohio Administrative Code Chapter 5160-1 gives the provider a reconsideration right, an internal audit appeal conducted by the ODM director or a designee who was not involved in the original decision. ODM's letter sets the deadline for the written request and supporting documentation, and the rule requires that deadline be no fewer than thirty days from the date on the letter. Reconsideration is the provider's opportunity to submit medical records, billing documentation, or a challenge to the sampling and extrapolation methodology before the finding is treated as settled. A decision issued on reconsideration is generally not subject to further reconsideration within the agency, which makes the initial submission the most consequential filing in the process.

Reconsideration is the provider's best chance to correct a flawed audit finding before it becomes a final, harder-to-reverse order, and treating it as a formality rather than a complete response is the most common and costly mistake providers make.

Formal Adjudication and Provider Obligations

If reconsideration does not resolve the matter, ODM may proceed to a formal adjudication order under Ohio Revised Code Section 5164.38, the same authority ODM uses to suspend or terminate a provider agreement or act on a final fiscal audit. Adjudication is conducted under Ohio Revised Code Chapter 119, Ohio's Administrative Procedure Act, and gives the provider the right to request a hearing before the order becomes final. A provider adversely affected by the resulting order may appeal to the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas under Ohio Revised Code Section 119.12. Unpaid overpayments continue to accrue interest until repaid, and in some fraud investigations ODM can suspend future payments entirely, addressed in Medicaid Payment Suspensions Under 42 CFR 455.23. Providers must preserve the records underlying the audited claims and respond to document requests on ODM's timeline; for issues discovered independently, a self-audit disclosure may be a better option, a decision covered in Medicaid Self-Audit Demand Letters: Options Before You Certify. A pattern of claims a provider knew, or should have known, were false can raise False Claims Act exposure, and unresolved audit findings can factor into an OIG exclusion determination.

Why Early Legal Counsel Is Critical

It is critical that Ohio providers promptly retain experienced healthcare defense counsel upon receiving an ODM audit notice or overpayment finding. Early legal intervention can protect the provider's rights, ensure a timely and complete reconsideration or appeal, avoid inadvertent admissions, and preserve relevant defenses. Delaying legal representation can significantly affect the outcome of a matter and expose the provider to unnecessary risk.

How Health Law Alliance Can Help

Health Law Alliance has represented 2,500+ clients across Medicaid and Medicare audit matters over 25+ years, including Ohio providers responding to ODM audits and overpayment findings. Our Medicaid audit defense attorneys handle reconsideration requests, adjudication hearings, and appeals from notice through resolution. Contact Health Law Alliance for a free, confidential consultation.