Physicians and nurse practitioners who bill chronic care management (CCM) for residents of a skilled nursing facility, nursing facility, or assisted living community face a Medicare billing rule that does not apply elsewhere. CMS pays CCM under the Physician Fee Schedule, but not for a month when the facility is already paid for the same care coordination. A practitioner who bills CPT 99490 for a resident in a Medicare Part A covered stay is billing for work the facility's own payment already covers.

What Chronic Care Management Covers

CCM applies to a patient with two or more chronic conditions expected to last at least 12 months, or until death, that place the patient at significant risk of death, acute exacerbation or decompensation, or functional decline. Medicare pays by monthly time: CPT 99490 covers the first 20 minutes of clinical staff time, 99491 covers 30 minutes personally furnished by the billing practitioner, and 99487 covers 60 minutes of complex CCM with moderate or high complexity medical decision-making; each has an add-on code for additional time. Physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, CNSs, and certified nurse midwives may bill CCM, with clinical staff furnishing it under general supervision.

When a Facility Resident's CCM Cannot Be Billed

CMS ties CCM eligibility for a facility resident to who is already being paid for that month's care coordination. In the CY 2014 Physician Fee Schedule final rule, CMS found that a practitioner's facility-based CCM work significantly overlaps with the care management facility staff already perform under the facility's own Medicare payment. CPT 99490 cannot be billed to the PFS for a resident who is a skilled nursing facility or hospital inpatient in a Medicare Part A covered stay, because the facility is paid under Part A for that same care planning and coordination. If the resident is not an inpatient the entire month, CCM time furnished outside the inpatient days still counts toward that month's threshold. A resident outside a Part A covered stay, including a long-term custodial resident, remains eligible for CCM billed by an outside practitioner.

Consent and the Care Plan CMS Requires

Before billing CCM, the practitioner must obtain the patient's written or verbal consent and document it in the record: that CCM is available, that cost-sharing may apply, that only one practitioner can bill CCM per calendar month, and that the patient can stop at any time, effective at month's end. Consent is obtained once, unless the patient switches billing practitioners. New patients, and patients not seen within the past year, need an initiating visit, an evaluation and management visit, annual wellness visit, or initial preventive physical exam, where CCM is discussed before services start. The care plan is kept electronically, centers on the patient's physical, mental, cognitive, psychosocial, functional, and environmental needs, and typically addresses the problem list, treatment goals, symptom management, and caregiver assessment. The same documentation habits that make a telehealth record survive review apply here: dated entries and a plan available on request inside and outside the billing practice.

Why the Facility Overlap Draws Audit Scrutiny

CMS built the facility exclusion on a duplicate-payment theory: the facility is already paid for the coordination CCM describes, so a second payment for the same month is a claim for a service Medicare already purchased once. That theory is what an extrapolation-based audit, including a UPIC review, is built to find across a practitioner's full CCM caseload. A billing pattern that does not track each resident's Part A status monthly invites a recoupment demand across the full lookback period, and repeated billing during covered stays can support a False Claims Act theory where the practitioner knew, or recklessly disregarded, the facility was already paid for the same coordination. A separate risk: paying a facility for referring CCM-eligible residents, tied to referral volume, can implicate the anti-kickback statute regardless of whether the claims themselves are billed correctly.

Medicare's CCM facility-setting rule turns on who is already being paid for that resident's care coordination that month.

Why Early Legal Counsel Is Critical

It is critical that physicians and senior living operators promptly retain experienced healthcare defense counsel once a CCM billing pattern is questioned, whether by a self-audit, a facility compliance review, or a government inquiry. Early legal intervention can review each resident's Part A status against the claims submitted, correct a pattern before it compounds across a full lookback period, and position the matter for an informed response rather than a reactive one. Delaying review can turn a correctable documentation gap into a larger recoupment.

How Health Law Alliance Can Help

Health Law Alliance defends physician practices and the monitoring and billing companies that support them, from the first records request through a UPIC investigation, a Medicare appeal, or a False Claims Act referral. Health Law Alliance's attorneys have overseen 2,000+ audits and handled 5,000+ matters, with 25+ years of experience. If your practice bills CCM for nursing home or senior living residents, contact Health Law Alliance's remote care management audit defense attorneys for a free, confidential consultation.